How Technology Both Advances and Threatens Our Human Rights
In our rapidly evolving digital age, technological advancements occur at a breathtaking pace. Where once innovations took decades to reach widespread adoption, technologies like ChatGPT now achieve what once took generations in mere months 7 . This acceleration brings both extraordinary promise and profound peril for human rights worldwide.
From artificial intelligence that can help reconstruct crime scenes to hold perpetrators accountable, to surveillance technologies that can monitor political dissidents, technology has become both a powerful tool for justice and a potential weapon of oppression 3 . This article explores how we might balance on this digital tightrope—harnessing technology's benefits while safeguarding our fundamental human rights.
Navigating between innovation and ethical safeguards
Rapid technological advancement transforming society
Safeguarding fundamental human rights in digital spaces
Artificial intelligence systems increasingly mediate our lives, from determining creditworthiness to screening job applications. Yet these systems often perpetuate and even amplify existing social inequalities. The algorithms used for advertisements and content display may exhibit racial, gender, or social biases, resulting in various forms of discrimination 9 .
When AI systems are trained on data that reflects historical inequalities, they learn to replicate these patterns in their decisions—creating a feedback loop that hardens discrimination into digital code.
Perhaps the most immediate threat emerges in the realm of privacy. Governments worldwide are deploying AI-powered surveillance systems with increasingly sophisticated capabilities. Facial recognition technology, combined with vast networks of cameras and sensors, enables unprecedented monitoring of populations 9 .
The right to privacy—enshrined in numerous international human rights instruments—faces unprecedented challenges from technologies that can infer sensitive personal information from seemingly innocuous data patterns 2 .
Cutting-edge neurotechnologies demonstrate technology's extraordinary potential to restore human dignity while simultaneously introducing novel rights concerns. Professors Jocelyne Bloch and Grégoire Courtine have developed a "digital bridge" between the brain and spinal cord that enables paralyzed patients to walk again by bypassing spinal cord injuries 7 .
The same technology that restores movement also introduces profound ethical challenges. As Professor Courtine notes, "Our patients can already control drones with their thoughts"—a capability that could be exploited for non-therapeutic or military purposes 7 .
As neurotechnology advances, it introduces unique vulnerabilities. Devices like the "digital bridge" are susceptible to disruptions from electromagnetic fields or hacking, which could compromise critical neurological data 7 .
The prospect of malicious actors gaining access to neural interfaces evokes dystopian scenarios where thoughts could be manipulated, stolen, or held hostage. What constitutes privacy when technology can decode our neural patterns? How do we protect against discrimination based on neurological data?
"We are at a key moment in history. What was science fiction a few decades ago is gradually becoming reality. It is our collective responsibility to shape this new era in an ethical and safe manner, while opening the doors to life-changing advances."
The benefits of technological advancement are distributed unevenly across the globe. The digital divide between developed and developing countries negatively affects individuals' ability to benefit from technology and related rights 9 .
When AI systems primarily reflect dominant global languages and perspectives, they limit people's ability to fully exercise their cultural rights in their native languages and benefit from AI innovations 2 . This undermines fundamental freedoms of expression, information access, and non-discrimination in increasingly digital everyday life.
The environmental impact of technology—particularly the energy and resource intensity of large-scale AI training—has potentially significant implications for sustainability and human rights 2 .
Similarly, the transition to renewable energy technologies has created a "green rush" that sometimes replicates patterns of exploitation long seen in extractive industries. Renewable energy projects have displaced communities, disrupted Indigenous livelihoods, and impacted food security for marginalized populations 8 .
As Jamaica prepared to roll out its national digital ID system, the organization SlashRoots implemented an innovative approach to ensure the system would be inclusive and rights-respecting . Their project serves as a compelling example of how technology development can incorporate human rights safeguards through meaningful public participation.
The methodology involved a series of carefully structured citizen participation opportunities including:
Participation Component | Key Outcomes | Rights Impact |
---|---|---|
Multi-stakeholder dialogues | Identified previously overlooked concerns of marginalized groups | Enhanced protection against discrimination |
Co-designed documentation | Made technical information accessible to non-experts | Strengthened right to information and participation |
Illustrative design patterns | Provided concrete examples of rights-respecting implementations | Facilitated right to privacy by design |
Ongoing feedback mechanisms | Created channels for continuous improvement | Established foundation for accountability |
Mapping all relevant stakeholders including marginalized communities
Conducting knowledge-sharing sessions with diverse groups
Collaborative design of accessible documentation and processes
Rolling out with continuous feedback mechanisms
A growing consensus emphasizes the need to embed human rights considerations directly into technology design processes. This approach requires technology companies to conduct human rights due diligence across the full lifecycle of their products 2 .
Effective regulation is essential to ensure that technological development respects human rights. The European Union's AI Act represents a significant step forward, prohibiting manipulative AI and social scoring systems that pose unacceptable risks 8 .
Ensuring that technological development benefits all humanity requires deliberate effort to include diverse perspectives. This includes promoting locally relevant AI models to protect cultural diversity and equal access to technological advancement 2 .
Governance Mechanism | Key Features | Human Rights Benefits |
---|---|---|
Risk-based classification | Different requirements based on system risk level | Proportional protection based on potential harm |
Fundamental rights impact assessments | Mandatory evaluation of rights implications | Prevention of rights violations before deployment |
Transparency obligations | Disclosure of AI use and data processing | Enabled meaningful consent and challenge |
Human oversight requirements | Human review of significant decisions | Protection against arbitrary automated decisions |
Redress mechanisms | Channels to challenge harmful decisions | Access to effective remedy for violations |
The relationship between technology and human rights represents one of the defining challenges of our time. There are no simple solutions, no easy answers to navigating the dual nature of technological progress.
Instead, we must walk the digital tightrope with our eyes open—aware of both the promises and perils, committed to harnessing technology's power while restraining its excesses. This requires vigilance from citizens, responsibility from technology companies, wisdom from policymakers, and solidarity across borders and sectors.
The future of human rights in the digital age will be determined by the choices we make today—about how we govern AI, how we regulate neurotechnology, how we bridge the digital divide, and how we ensure that technological progress serves human dignity rather than undermining it.